Economy, services and rights

Rego supports the 37.5-hour bill as a first step while seeking 35 and eventually 32 hours. Preferring a larger reduction is not treated as opposition to this measure.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

Radio Sintonía’s own interview records Valido’s support for the 37.5-hour bill conditional on SME compensation measures. This is conditional support, not an unconditional promise or our own claim about European working hours.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

The Basque group supports processing the 37.5-hour cap and a statutory framework, with transitional measures, SME support and collective bargaining. Its support includes these adaptation conditions.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

Matute supports the bill reducing the maximum from 40 to 37.5 hours without lower pay. Many Basque agreements already have shorter weeks; he sees the reform as progress for other workers.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

Salvador explicitly supports the 37.5-hour reform and explains SME assistance and adaptation negotiated by ERC. Support is established by his speech, not the vote alone.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

Cervera opposes the mandatory 37.5-hour proposal and advocates flexibility, bargaining and productivity. He also says Junts does not oppose every reduction in hours; this answer concerns the proposed legal cap.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

Santana supports the 37.5-hour bill without a pay cut while proposing a 30-hour week. This is support as a first step, not a 29N manifesto.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

Bravo argues for returning the statutory 37.5-hour bill and reducing hours through agreements. Opposition concerns the mandatory proposal, not every negotiated reduction.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

Mayoral supports processing the statutory 37.5-hour bill without lower pay on behalf of the Socialist group and opposes returning it. This records its 2025 debate position, not a claim that the measure is in force.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

June 2025 mobilisation guide, physical page 2, explicitly supports 37.5 hours without lower pay. Exact publication date is unstated; first observed on 6 October 2026.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

UPN rejects imposition in the 37.5-hour bill debate and supports social dialogue. This records opposition to the proposed legal cap while preserving its support for labour agreements.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

Figaredo argues for returning the 37.5-hour bill and opposes the mandatory cap because of its effects on small businesses. This establishes opposition to this reform, not every working-time agreement.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

BNG supports uprating with actual year-on-year CPI and larger increases for minimum and non-contributory pensions. The speech establishes its indexation position separately from its vote on the 2026 decree.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

Valido supports revaluation under the Toledo Pact and asks for increases above inflation, particularly for low pensions.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

The Basque group supports retaining CPI uprating and warns of silent year-after-year cuts without it. It also calls for stronger pension-system revenues.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

Matute supports CPI-linked pension revaluation and calls for further protection by raising minimum pensions.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

ERC supports the agreement to index pensions to CPI, contrasts it with the previous 0.25% rule and says it must not be broken again. This supports the rule as well as the 2026 increase.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

Ten supports inflation-linked pension increases and additionally seeks adjustment for territorial living costs. The qualification concerns the index, rather than freezing pensions.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

Podemos supports CPI uprating to protect purchasing power and seeks minimum pensions at the minimum wage. Coding uses its defence of the indexation rule, not just its vote on the 2026 increase.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

Tellado supports automatic CPI adjustments in a separate bill. Rejection of a decree containing other measures is not coded as opposition to pension adjustments.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

Esther Peña defends statutory CPI linking in Congress during the pension adjustment debate. Supports adjustments; no pension opposition is inferred for other parties.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

The Sumar group spokesperson supports restoring automatic CPI uprating instead of the 0.25% limit. This is attributed to the parliamentary group he represents, not individually to every constituent party.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

Alli supports linking pensions to CPI to preserve purchasing power. Historical evidence, supplemented by support for revaluation in 2026.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

2023 general-election manifesto (historical reference). Proposes changing national healthcare management law to reserve ownership, funding, management and provision to public bodies.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

CC-PNC’s own Canary Islands parliamentary intervention (2017; territorial and historical evidence). González Taño supports retaining and evaluating private healthcare contracts with the same quality standards as public providers. The CC-PNC group’s Canary Islands position retains contracted services within free universal public healthcare rather than returning all of them to public management.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

Basque Health Pact, public/private collaboration section, approved and explicitly endorsed by EAJ-PNV on 27 June 2025 (territorial context). PNV endorses the Basque Health Pact, retaining private collaboration where it adds value, prioritising public capacity and capping contracted expenditure at its existing share. It allows inefficient or strategic services to return to public provision, rather than a general reversal of all contracted provision.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

2023 general-election manifesto (historical reference). Seeks repeal of the national law permitting healthcare privatisation and outsourcing. The assessment records that direction towards public management, without claiming a timetable for individual contracts.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

ERC’s national parliamentary intervention on healthcare management (2017; historical reference). Eritja calls for national healthcare to move towards public management. He explains ending contracts with for-profit private centres as they expire when a public centre can take over, rather than immediately cancelling all providers.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

Calvo defends Catalonia’s mixed healthcare model and seeks withdrawal of national legislation making indirect management exceptional. Opposes replacing that model with mandatory direct public management.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

Podemos’s proposal supports direct public management and reversing privatisation, starting with inspection of contracted and concession services. Published in 2025; neither a 29N manifesto nor a claim that reversal has been enacted.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

PP parliamentary position on healthcare management in 2022 (historical reference). Pastor opposes ending private-provider contracts and supports private bodies continuing to deliver publicly funded services, in debate on national healthcare management reform.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

The coalition cabinet approves promoting direct public management and facilitating reversals of concessions, preserving legal certainty for existing contracts. This is joint PSOE–Sumar government policy presented by García.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

The 2026 International Women’s Day manifesto proposes reversing healthcare and education privatisation. Thematic document, not a 29N manifesto; exact date unstated, first observed on 6 October.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

UPN’s 13th congress policy and statute papers (2024). UPN’s adopted Navarre healthcare policy supports continued public–private collaboration subject to quality and efficiency, rather than returning contracted services to public management. It does not endorse every privatisation.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

2023 general-election manifesto, copy published by RTVE (historical reference). Proposes expanding private healthcare contracts to reduce waiting times, opposing exclusive public management.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

2023 general-election manifesto (historical reference). Proposes more progressive taxation and fewer exemptions, seeking Galician administration.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

Ana Oramas’s own CC statement to the Finance Committee (2008; historical evidence). Oramas explicitly supports abolishing wealth tax as part of a limited fiscal reform rather than other groups’ comprehensive reforms. This 2008 national position contrasts with retaining a wealth levy; it is not presented as a current statement on the solidarity tax on large fortunes created years later.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

PNV–PSE fiscal agreement of 31 January 2023 (historical reference). PNV and PSE reaffirm implementing the large-fortunes solidarity tax through adaptation to foral territories, bilateral agreement and changes to the Economic Agreement Act in Congress. This documents support for the national tax while respecting the foral tax system in 2023.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

2023 general-election manifesto (historical reference). Proposes making the tax permanent, respecting Basque and Navarre fiscal administration.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

2023 general-election manifesto (historical reference). Supports retaining and improving the large-fortunes tax to curb internal tax competition.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

Amendment 225 retains the large-fortunes tax until financing reform but proposes suspending the separate wealth tax meanwhile. Conditional support for its design, distinct from abolishing both taxes.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

Proposes increasing wealth taxation with state coordination to fund services.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

2023 general-election manifesto (historical reference). Proposes ending the large-fortunes tax; this does not establish opposition to every progressive tax.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

Sánchez defends the solidarity tax on wealth above three million euros and its role in countering tax competition.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

2023 general-election manifesto (historical reference). Proposes a permanent, more progressive large-fortunes tax.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

2023 Navarre regional manifesto (territorial and historical evidence). Its regional manifesto proposes a 100% wealth-tax rebate in Navarre. This is regional opposition to that levy, rather than a promise to repeal the national solidarity tax.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

VOX amendment 104 opposes making the large-fortunes tax permanent and seeks removal of the article changing its design, alongside amendments against extending it.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

2023 general-election manifesto (historical reference). Proposes gradually ending private-school subsidies and expanding public provision.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

Its LOMLOE amendment 114 prioritises public schools in planning and expansion; subsidised private schools would be subsidiary and gradually integrate through negotiation.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

Escandell argues that subsidised private schools should supplement public provision rather than have equal standing through demand-based planning, and supports strengthening public education.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

Castellví favours sufficient publicly funded places across both systems rather than public-school places alone, defending public and subsidised private provision together.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

Podemos’s own 2024 European manifesto; policy for the EU and its member states. Proposes public schools covering 90% of demand within a decade and countering segregation in systems with extensive private-school subsidies.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

Ruz proposes changing education law article 109 to guarantee subsidised private places according to demand, within a dual system without priority for public provision.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

41st Congress political resolution (2024). The 41st Congress resolution prioritises public-school classes when provision expands or contracts, with subsidised private schools playing a complementary role. It does not propose closing that entire network.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

2023 general-election manifesto (historical reference). Proposes funding subsidised private schools only where public places are insufficient and progressively increasing public schools’ share of funding.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

Catalán explicitly supports the specific motion to change article 109 and guarantee subsidised private places according to demand, citing parents’ freedom of choice.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

2023 general-election manifesto, copy published by RTVE (historical reference). Proposes school-voucher funding for choice between school models, rather than prioritising public-school places.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

Rego supports restoring decision-making at 16 and 17 and demands abortion provision in public healthcare.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

Organic Law 1/2023, articles 13 and 19: legislative evidence from 2023. Votes for the 2023 abortion reform, including public provision and decisions at 16 and 17 without parental consent. Evidence from the final law vote rather than a procedural vote.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

Organic Law 1/2023, articles 13 and 19: legislative evidence from 2023. Votes for the 2023 abortion reform, including public provision and decisions at 16 and 17 without parental consent. Evidence from the final law vote rather than a procedural vote.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

Organic Law 1/2023, articles 13 and 19: legislative evidence from 2023. Votes for the 2023 abortion reform, including public provision and decisions at 16 and 17 without parental consent. Evidence from the final law vote rather than a procedural vote.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

Organic Law 1/2023, articles 13 and 19: legislative evidence from 2023. Votes for the 2023 abortion reform, including public provision and decisions at 16 and 17 without parental consent. Evidence from the final law vote rather than a procedural vote.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

Organic Law 1/2023, articles 13 and 19: legislative evidence from 2023. Votes for the 2023 abortion reform, including public provision and decisions at 16 and 17 without parental consent. Evidence from the final law vote rather than a procedural vote.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

Irene Montero advocates public healthcare provision and restoring autonomous decisions for women aged 16 and 17.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

2023 general-election manifesto (historical reference). Proposes parental authorisation for minors. The opposition concerns autonomy at 16–17, not abortion in every circumstance.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

2023 general-election manifesto (historical reference). Supports restoring autonomy at 16–17; the proposals seek equal access across regions and rural areas.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

Its constitutional proposal supports universal abortion access and explicitly endorses the 2023 reform: decisions from age 16 without parental permission and provision in public facilities.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

UPN’s 13th congress policy and statute papers (2024). Its adopted 2024 statutes explicitly oppose abortion; that general opposition encompasses the public access asked about.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

2023 general-election manifesto (historical reference). Proposes repeal of abortion and euthanasia laws and removal of some services, a broader opposition than consent at 16–17.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

Supports the bill allowing legal gender changes from age 16 without medical reports or hormone treatment. Legislative evidence from 2022, enacted as Law 4/2023.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

Supports the bill allowing legal gender changes from age 16 without medical reports or hormone treatment. Legislative evidence from 2022, enacted as Law 4/2023.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

Supports the bill allowing legal gender changes from age 16 without medical reports or hormone treatment. Legislative evidence from 2022, enacted as Law 4/2023.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

Supports the bill allowing legal gender changes from age 16 without medical reports or hormone treatment. Legislative evidence from 2022, enacted as Law 4/2023.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

2023 general-election manifesto (historical reference). Supports implementing and expanding the 2023 law, including legal recognition below age twelve; its proposal goes beyond the quiz’s age-16 threshold.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

Calvo supports broader self-determined legal recognition, including younger children, distinguishing registration from surgery or hormones.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

Irene Montero supports self-determination without treating trans identity as an illness. This is her identified ministerial speech, not attribution to an entire coalition.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

Moro rejects self-determination at 16 without diagnosis and calls for revision; this is not rejection of all LGBT rights.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

Supports the bill allowing legal gender changes from age 16 without medical reports or hormone treatment. Legislative evidence from 2022, enacted as Law 4/2023.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

2023 general-election manifesto (historical reference). Supports implementing Law 4/2023 and trans self-determination. Legal recognition from age 16 without diagnosis is part of the framework it endorses, rather than a proposal for a new age threshold.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

Catalán rejects the 2023 law and demands parental and professional involvement in minors’ self-definition, distinguishing that opposition from support for LGBT equality and dignity.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

2023 general-election manifesto, copy published by RTVE (historical reference). Proposes repealing the 2023 law and explicitly rejects legal gender self-determination.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

Supports lawful assistance in dying with medical safeguards and personal choice, seeking to avoid unnecessary court delays.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

Valido recalls Coalición Canaria voting for the euthanasia law, distinguishing that support from other disagreements with the government.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

Supports lawful assistance in dying with medical safeguards and personal choice, seeking to avoid unnecessary court delays.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

Supports lawful assistance in dying with medical safeguards and personal choice, seeking to avoid unnecessary court delays.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

Supports lawful assistance in dying with medical safeguards and personal choice, seeking to avoid unnecessary court delays.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

Supports lawful assistance in dying with medical safeguards and personal choice, seeking to avoid unnecessary court delays.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

Supports lawful assistance in dying with medical safeguards and personal choice, seeking to avoid unnecessary court delays.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

Available sources do not establish support or opposition to this proposal. This does not mean the party is neutral.

PP: Assisted dying

Supports lawful assistance in dying with medical safeguards and personal choice, seeking to avoid unnecessary court delays.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

Supports lawful assistance in dying with medical safeguards and personal choice, seeking to avoid unnecessary court delays.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

UPN’s 13th congress policy and statute papers (2024). Its 2024 statutes explicitly oppose euthanasia.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026

Rejects euthanasia and prioritises palliative care, assistance and family support.

Reviewed: October 7, 2026