How they voted in parliament← All topics

Religion and public life

We compare reviewed statements, proposals and older manifestos, rather than 29N manifesto promises. Support and opposition refer to the exact statement above each table. A gap does not mean neutrality or no position. Regional sources are marked as territorial context.

Method and limits

Burqa and niqab in public spaces

Wearing a burqa or niqab, which conceal the face, should be banned in streets, on transport and in other public spaces.

The hijab leaves the face visible and is outside this question. A general ban differs from requiring someone to uncover their face for identification or punishing someone who forces another person to cover up.

Wearing a burqa or niqab, which conceal the face, should be banned in streets, on transport and in other public spaces.
PartyDocumented position
BNGInsufficient evidence
Coalición CanariaInsufficient evidence
EAJ-PNVInsufficient evidence
Explanation and sources

Available sources do not establish support or opposition to this proposal. This does not mean the party is neutral.

EAJ-PNV: Burqa and niqab in public spaces

EH BilduOpposes the proposal

Congress speech, 14 April 2026. Opposes a general ban and coercion of women, distinguishing a ban from neutral identification rules for specific services.

Explanation and sources

Reviewed:

Read evidence and context
ERCOpposes the proposal

Congress speech, 14 April 2026. Rejects the proposed ban and defends women’s freedom; criticism of the burqa is not treated as support for penalising its use.

Explanation and sources

Reviewed:

Read evidence and context
JuntsSupports the proposal

Bill tabled by Junts; not enacted. Its bill bans face covering in public spaces, with exceptions, and adds the delegation of security and identification powers to Catalonia.

Explanation and sources

Reviewed:

Read evidence and context
PodemosOpposes the proposal

Congress speech, 14 April 2026. Opposes the state dictating how women dress and warns that a ban would isolate them.

Explanation and sources

Reviewed:

Read evidence and context
PPSupports the proposal

Congress speech, 14 April 2026. Supports banning the burqa and niqab across Spain. Its vote against Junts’s bill reflects opposition to transferring powers, rather than opposition to the ban.

Explanation and sources

Reviewed:

Read evidence and context
PSOEOpposes the proposal

Congress speech, 14 April 2026. Opposes fines and general bans; proposes mediation, integration and support for women facing coercion.

Explanation and sources

Reviewed:

Read evidence and context
SumarOpposes the proposal

Congress speech, 14 April 2026. Opposes a face-veil ban and supports the freedom to cover or uncover without coercion.

Explanation and sources

Reviewed:

Read evidence and context
UPNSupports the proposal

Javier Esparza’s direct statement in the Navarre parliament, reported by RTVE. Javier Esparza supports banning the burqa because of its impact on women’s freedom, while criticising VOX’s framing.

Territorial context

Explanation and sources

Reviewed:

Read evidence and context
VOXSupports the proposal

Congress speech, 14 April 2026. Supports a public-space ban on the burqa and niqab; rejects Junts’s bill over its transfer of powers.

Explanation and sources

Reviewed:

Read evidence and context

Extended comparison · not scored in the quiz

Religion in public schools

Public schools should offer optional religious classes, including Islam, to families who request them.

This concerns teaching a faith as religion, rather than studying the history of religions. We compare optional religious instruction with keeping it outside school hours.

Public schools should offer optional religious classes, including Islam, to families who request them.
PartyDocumented position
BNGOpposes the proposal

2023 general-election manifesto (historical reference). Proposes removing religion from the school curriculum and leaving faith instruction to families and private settings.

First observed:

Explanation and sources

Reviewed:

Read evidence and context
Coalición CanariaInsufficient evidence
EAJ-PNVInsufficient evidence
EH BilduOpposes the proposal

2024 Basque manifesto published by Pello Otxandiano’s candidacy (territorial and historical evidence). Proposes removing religion from basic curricula and its funding, while retaining scientific and critical study of different religions.

First observed:

Territorial context

Explanation and sources

Reviewed:

Read evidence and context
ERCOpposes the proposal

2023 general-election manifesto (historical reference). Proposes faith instruction in places of worship, outside the public-school curriculum, distinguishing it from cultural study of religions.

First observed:

Explanation and sources

Reviewed:

Read evidence and context
JuntsInsufficient evidence
PodemosInsufficient evidence
PPInsufficient evidence
PSOEInsufficient evidence
SumarOpposes the proposal

2023 general-election manifesto (historical reference). Proposes keeping confessional instruction outside the curriculum and school hours; cultural study of religions is a separate issue.

First observed:

Explanation and sources

Reviewed:

Read evidence and context
UPNInsufficient evidence
VOXOpposes the proposal

VOX’s 2019 policy document (historical evidence, not a 29N manifesto). Called for excluding Islamic instruction from public schools. This specifically opposes Islam, rather than proposing removal of all religious instruction.

First observed:

Explanation and sources

Reviewed:

Read evidence and context

Extended comparison · not scored in the quiz

Foreign funding of mosques

Foreign governments should be banned from funding mosques or other places of worship in Spain.

This concerns foreign-government money, rather than individual donations. Requiring transparency or prosecuting terrorist financing differs from banning all such funding.

Foreign governments should be banned from funding mosques or other places of worship in Spain.
PartyDocumented position
BNGInsufficient evidence
Coalición CanariaInsufficient evidence
EAJ-PNVInsufficient evidence
EH BilduInsufficient evidence
ERCInsufficient evidence
JuntsInsufficient evidence
PodemosInsufficient evidence
PPInsufficient evidence
PSOEInsufficient evidence
SumarInsufficient evidence
UPNInsufficient evidence
VOXSupports the proposal

VOX’s 2019 policy document (historical evidence, not a 29N manifesto). Called for banning third-country funding of places of worship in Spain, including more than mosques alone. Historical 2019 evidence.

First observed:

Explanation and sources

Reviewed:

Read evidence and context